1 / 57

INVITATION FOR PROPOSALS (IFP) PROCESS

INVITATION FOR PROPOSALS (IFP) PROCESS. Competitive Procurement. PROCUREMNT OVERVIEW. Request For Qualifications (RFQ) - Soliticitation Creation of DAGS-SPO Vendor List Invitation For Proposals (IFP) Solicitation - Competition for a Project in accordance with DAGS-SPO Vendor List

rowland
Download Presentation

INVITATION FOR PROPOSALS (IFP) PROCESS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. INVITATION FOR PROPOSALS (IFP) PROCESS Competitive Procurement

  2. PROCUREMNT OVERVIEW • Request For Qualifications (RFQ) - Soliticitation Creation of DAGS-SPO Vendor List • Invitation For Proposals (IFP) Solicitation - Competition for a Project in accordance with DAGS-SPO Vendor List • ESCO Selection for a Project (one ESCO from DAGS-SPO Vendor List)

  3. PROCUREMENT PROCESS OVERVIEW Phase I: RFQ Written Responses Phase II: Client References Phase III: IFP Written Responses Phase IV: Oral Interviews (as needed)

  4. BENEFITS OF PREQUALIFYING ESCOs • Gives agencies confidence that companies have the requisite experience, technical capabilities and financial strength to implement projects • Expedites procurement cycles by allowing agencies to issue project-specific IFPs • Offer ESCOs a credible calling card to inform and educate agencies on energy performance contracting

  5. BENEFITS OF PREQUALIFYING ESCOs • Offers an opportunity to limit the number of proposals received by agencies, thereby reducing workload on agency personnel • Eliminates ESCOs that do not have the capabilities of implementing high quality projects • Mitigates agency concerns about an ESCO’s ability to perform for the duration of a contract

  6. THE VALUE OF QUALIFICATIONS • Project scope and price can be negotiated – qualifications can not • Better qualified ESCOs will generally present better technical/cost proposals • Energy performance contracts are long-term partnerships, so pick a reliable partner with a proven track record

  7. INFORMATION REQUESTED FOR IFP PROCESS • Technical Qualifications of Personnel • Specific Experience with Guaranteed Energy Savings Projects • Detailed Project Histories and Client References for 10 Completed Projects in Repayment • Client Reference Contact Information • Sample Commissioning Plan

  8. INFORMATION REQUESTED FOR IFP PROCESS • Sample Final Design Specification • Sample Measurement & Verification Plan • Sample O&M Manual • Sample Customer Savings Report • Sample Investment Grade Audit • Financial Statements and References

  9. IFP PHASE OF THE PROJECT • Only pre-qualified ESCOs are invited to respond • Typically, a short list of three pre-qualified ESCOs is invited to respond to the IFP based on specific project qualifications to make competition manageable • However, on the DAGS-SPO Vendor List, all ESCOs can compete to ensure maximum competition

  10. PURPOSE OF THE IFP PROCESS • Defines the technical scope of the project • Describes the procurement process • Establishes the project schedule • Defines the evaluation criteria • Experience, Management, Technical, Financial • Highlights special project terms and conditions • Technical & Contractual

  11. PROJECT TECHNICAL SCOPE Customer Project Goals • To maximize facility capital renewal, and if allowable, include customer contributions to fund some costs, with the majority funded from energy project savings • To fully fund the project exclusively from achieved utility and operational savings Regardless, inform the ESCO up-front

  12. SAMPLE STEPS FOR IFP AND IMPLEMENTATION OF ESPC PROCESS

  13. SAMPLE PROJECT SCHEDULE ACTIVITYTIMEFRAME • Issue IFP Week 1 • Site Visit (to be arranged) Weeks 3-5 • Proposals due Week 6 • Written proposals reviewed & evaluated Weeks 6-10 • Oral interviews Week 12 • ESCO selection Week 14 • Approval of selected ESCO Week 14 • Investment grade audit, project analysis, ESPC negotiations Weeks 16-29 • ESPC presented & signed Week 32

  14. IFP PROCESS – TYPCIAL INFORMATION REQUESTED • Qualifications & Experience of Project Team Members • Detailed information on project management • Technical experience of key staff • Detailed energy performance data on past projects • Client references • NAESCO Accreditation

  15. IFP PROCESS – TYPICAL INFORMATION REQUESTED • Financial Information • Audited financial statements, financial ratings, bonding capacity • Subcontractor Information (if known) • Corporate Background • Technical Qualifications • Financial References

  16. IFP PROCESS – TYPCIAL INFORMATION REQUESTED • Energy Baseline Calculation Methodology • Project Work Plan and Milestones • Technical and Cost Proposal • Proposed Project Financing

  17. IFP PROCESS – TYPCIAL INFORMATION REQUESTED • Energy/Cost Savings Calculation Methodology • Savings M&V Plan • Commissioning Plan and Training Provisions • Maintenance Plan

  18. AGENCY GUIDANCE ON SAVINGS CALCULATIONS • Provide reasonable escalation rates to value future savings for cash flow analysis • Require materials and maintenance savings be clearly calculated and documented • Require utility bill reconstruction be used to value savings -- not average costs

  19. IFP EVALUATION PROCESS GOALS Transparency Objectivity Accuracy Well Defined Criteria Efficiency Technical Competence Consistency Fairness Effectiveness

  20. IFP EVALUATORS MUST: • Be technically proficient • Be motivated and interested in the project • Participate in evaluation training prior to serving on evaluation committees • Exercise diligence and responsibly review and objectively compare qualifications

  21. IFP EVALUATION GUIDELINES • Focus on the quality of evaluation, rather than the quantity of evaluators • Remember that selecting ESCOs with ALL the necessary capabilities is crucial • To overstate the obvious: Do not discuss the substance of the evaluation process with the competing ESCOs during the evaluation

  22. IFP EVALUATION GUIDELINES • Assign evaluation criteria to team members according to their relevant expertise • Allow project staff to observe oral interviews and read proposals to facilitate their education about the project and promote ownership • Offer to debrief unsuccessful ESCOs on how they can improve future proposals

  23. IFP EVALUATION GUIDELINES • Assume that evaluation team rankings may be disclosed in a future FOIA request • Unjustified extreme rankings will be a red flag for any ESCO pursuing a bid protest under FOIA

  24. IFP EVALUATION TEAM MEMBERS • Energy manager • Designated project manager • Technical advisor/consultants • Project engineer • Facilities operating personnel • Administrative/financial managers

  25. IFP MAJOR EVALUATIONCATAGORIES • Experience • Project Management • Technical • Financial • Other/Special Project Requirements (if applicable)

  26. ASSIGN PROJECT MANAGEMENT EVALUATION CRITERIA OF IFP TO: • Facilities operating personnel • Energy manager • Administrative/financial managers • Designated project manager • Technical advisor/consultants

  27. ASSIGN TECHNICAL EVALUATION CRITERIA OF IFP TO: • Project engineer • Facilities operating personnel • Energy manager • Designated project manager • Technical advisor/consultants

  28. ASSIGN FINANCIAL EVALUATION CRITERIA OF IFP TO: • Administrative/financial managers • Designated project manager • Technical advisor/consultants

  29. IFP EVALUATION CRITERIA NON-NEGOTIABLE Experience • Technical qualifications and experience of ESCO’s personnel • Experience with implementing energy savings • Quality of project history and documented savings performance of past projects • Quality of customer service on past projects • Reliability of equipment performance on past projects • Quality of technical skills on past projects

  30. IFP EVALUATION CRITERIA NON-NEGOTIABLE Project Management • Ability to effectively manage past project construction • Ability to manage equipment repairs, regular service, and emergencies effectively on past projects • Quality of ESCO’s communication skills

  31. IFP EVALUATION CRITERIA NON-NEGOTIABLE Technical • Comprehensiveness of technical approach to past projects • Ability to plan and complete all schedule phases of past projects • Quality of operations and maintenance services on past projects

  32. IFP EVALUATION CRITERIA NON-NEGOTIABLE Financial • Financial soundness and stability of the ESCO • Demonstrated ability to provide or arrange project financing on past projects

  33. IFP EVALUATION CRITERIANEGOTIABLE Project Management • Comprehensiveness of maintenance, monitoring, and measurement and verification services • Proposed O&M strategies

  34. IFP EVALUATION CRITERIANEGOTIABLE Technical • Quality of investment grade audit report • Quality of approach to project commissioning • Quality of approach to calculating baseline energy consumption • Quality of approach to savings measurement and verification • Quality of provisions for training facility staff • Quality of customer savings reporting

  35. IFP EVALUATION CRITERIANEGOTIABLE Financial • Reasonableness of financial assumptions for the proposed project • Details of proposed financing arrangement

  36. HOW TO DO CLIENT REFERENCES FOR IFP • Check similar projects • Check at least three references; five is better • Develop a standardized list of questions to be ranked by the client reference • Phone interviews of knowledgeable clients is the most efficient method • Allow client reference to conduct actual rankings

  37. CLIENT REFERENCE QUESTIONSPROJECT MANAGEMENT • How would you rank the ESCOs’ management of subcontractors? • How would you rank their handling of change orders and repairs? • How would you rank their handling of project logistics and scheduling?

  38. CLIENT REFERENCE QUESTIONSPROJECT MANAGEMENT • How would you rank the overall quality of their project manager? • How would you rank their quality control on project installation? • How would you rank the quality of their project commissioning?

  39. CLIENT REFERENCE QUESTIONS QUALITY OF ESCO STAFF • How would you rank the quality of their communications skills? • Would you do another project with the same people? • How would you rank the quality of their technical skills?

  40. CLIENT REFERENCE QUESTIONS QUALITY OF ESCO STAFF • How would you rank their customer service? • What was their strongest capability? • What was their weakest area in your opinion?

  41. CLIENT REFERENCE QUESTIONSENERGY SAVINGS PERFORMANCE • How would you rank the energy savings performance of the project? • How would you rank the consistency, quality and timeliness of their customer savings reports? • What percent of predicted savings were stipulated (i.e., not requiring M&V)?

  42. CLIENT REFERENCE QUESTIONS RELIABILITY OF EQUIPMENT • Did the ESCO install high quality equipment? • Does the installed equipment achieve the design intent? • Does the equipment operate reliably? • Did the installed equipment create any new operation or maintenance problems? If so, did the ESCO solve them effectively? • Does the ESCO appropriately monitor equipment performance?

  43. CLIENT REFERENCE QUESTIONSTECHNICAL CAPABILITIES • What were the main measures included besides lighting and controls work? • Did the ESCO capture the available savings opportunities and minimize life cycle costs? • Did the ESCO provide adequate documentation for all of the savings measures installed? • How would you rank the quality of the ESCO’s overall project design? • If you were to change any aspect of the project scope, what change would you make? Why?

  44. CLIENT REFERENCE QUESTIONSPROJECT PERFORMANCE • Did the ESCO meet the project schedule? • Design phase • Project construction phase • Quality of the post-construction services? • Equipment performance monitoring • Ongoing equipment maintenance and training • Savings M&V for the full term of the contract • Does any EMS system the ESCO installed provide user-friendly system monitoring and control?

  45. IFP ESCO EVALUATIONRANKING GUIDELINES • Be consistent in your rankings and avoid the “halo and horns” effect • Just because an ESCO is superior or unacceptable on some criteria, does not mean the ESCO is superior or unacceptable on all criteria

  46. IFP ESCO EVALUATIONRANKING GUIDELINES • It is very helpful to defer any rankings until you have reviewed proposal submissions on that criterion from all ESCOs so that you can get a feel for the range of quality. • You can sort the ESCOs based on how they compare to each other on that criterion: 1 3 5 Worst ESCO Avg ESCO Best ESCO

  47. IFP ESCO EVALUATIONRANKING GUIDELINES • Using a scale of 1-5 pts., average performance is a 3 • 0 or 1pt. should be given when the information provided is incomplete, non-responsive, or poor quality • 5 pts. should be given rarely, to truly superior performance compared to other ESCO written submissions

  48. IFP ESCO EVALUATIONRANKING GUIDELINES • If you find that a majority of your rankings are 4 pts., you may not be making effective comparisons between ESCOs. • Carefully review the submissions for differences in quality. Remember that your job is to rank the ESCOs.

  49. IFP ESCO EVALUATIONRANKING GUIDELINES • “Unable to rank” means the evaluator has insufficient personal knowledge or experience to evaluate the data provided. This should be a rare occurrence unless the evaluation task has been improperly assigned to someone with inadequate training and/or background. • This ranking category does not hurt the ESCO’s average score on this criterion.

  50. IFP ORAL INTERVIEWGUIDELINES • The goal of the interview is to get a complete understanding of the ESCOs’ proposals, capabilities, design staff, technical analysis, and project costs. • Limit prepared ESCO presentations to 15 minutes. • Prepare 2 sets of questions: General and Proposal-specific • If you have detailed technical questions, supply them to the ESCO in advance of the interview.

More Related