1 / 22

W2/8/12

W2/8/12. Conflict Between States (Ch. 8.2 – pp. 247-256). I. Shapes of States. A. Five basic shapes 1. Compact = close to equal distance from center efficient – good communication 2. Elongated = long & narrow shape potential isolation – poor communication Ex: Malawi, Chile, Italy, Gambia

sahara
Download Presentation

W2/8/12

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. W2/8/12 Conflict Between States (Ch. 8.2 – pp. 247-256)

  2. I. Shapes of States A. Five basic shapes • 1. Compact = close to equal distance from center • efficient – good communication • 2. Elongated = long & narrow shape • potential isolation – poor communication • Ex: Malawi, Chile, Italy, Gambia • 3. Prorupted = compact state w/ protruding extension • access or disruption; often related to water source (Congo) or holdover from imperialism (Namibia; Afghanistan) • 4. Perforated = completely surrounds another state • South Africa w/ Lesotho; Gambia w/ Senegal • 5. Fragmented = non-contiguous parts – problematic • Often due to water (Tanzania, Indonesia) or imperialism (Angola, Panama, India’s Tin Bigha corridor, Russia)

  3. Shapes of States in Southern Africa

  4. I. Shapes of States B. Landlocked states • state that lacks direct access to sea • most common in Africa (Botswana, Zimbabwe, etc.) • but present on most continents (Bolivia & Paraguay) • need good relations w/ neighbors – why? • potential problems?

  5. II. Types of Boundaries A. Physical • 1. Desert boundaries • Most common in Africa & Asia – Sahara & Gobi • 2. Mountain boundaries • Andes, Alps, Himalayas • Early U.S. history – Appalachian (British vs. French) • 3. Water boundaries • Rivers, lakes, oceans • River borders often change over time (Rio Grande) • Differences worked out w/ mediators

  6. Mountain Boundary

  7. II. Types of Boundaries B. Cultural • 1. Geometric boundaries • line or arc • U.S.-Canadian border – 49th parallel (MN-Pacific) • occasional conflict – Libya-Chad (Aozou strip) • 2. Human features • language (most of Europe traditionally; esp. after WWI) • religion (India/Pakistan, Northern Ireland) • ethnicity – often problematic (esp. Balkans, former USSR)

  8. Geometric Border – 49th Parallel - US-Canadian Border

  9. II. Types of Boundaries C. Cyprus’ “Green Line” Boundary • independent since 1960 divided by ethnicity • Greek (S) & Turkish (N) • wall built to separate regions • includes buffer zone • forced migration ensued • sides closer in recent years

  10. Cyprus’ Two Zones: Turkish - North Greek - South

  11. Cultural Boundary

  12. II. Types of Boundaries • D. Frontiers vs. Boundaries • boundary = invisible line marking extent of state’s territory • frontier = zone where no state has full control • frontiers were usually lightly inhabited • most frontiers have become boundaries recently • ex: Arabian peninsula

  13. III. Boundaries Inside States • Unitary States • most of power in central government • more common in smaller states • Ex: USSR, China, traditional France (see below) B. Federal States • shared power b/w central and local gov’ts • more common in larger states • Ex: USA, Canada, Russia, Belgium • globally, there is a trend toward federations • Ex: France recently; Poland post-Communism

  14. III. Boundaries Inside States (cont.) C. Electoral Geography • boundaries within the United States are used to create legislative districts based on cenusus • gerrymandering = process of redrawing legislative boundaries to help party in power • named for Elbridge Gerry (MA Gov. & VP) • three types: wasted, excess, and stacked vote • wasted = spread opposition over districts but in minority • excess = concentrate opposition in high #s in a few districts • stacked = links distant voters, used to help particular groups • illegal (1985 U.S. Supreme Court decision); • difficult to enforce • still some new gerrymandered districts created (2001 NC) – why?

  15. 52% - 5 districts 48% - 0 districts D1 D2 D3 D4 D5

  16. 52% - 1 districts 48% - 4 districts D1 D2 D3 1 – 13A, 2 – 13A, 3 – 13A, 4 – 13A, 5 – 13A D4 D5

  17. 52% - 3 districts 48% - 2 districts D1 D2 D4 D3 D5

  18. Iowa - No Gerrymandering

  19. North Carolina – Racial Gerrymandering

  20. Florida – Political Gerrymandering

More Related