1 / 20

Policy instruments for environmental protection

Policy instruments for environmental protection. Presentation 9 Environment and Sustainable Development course UNU-MERIT PhD programme . René Kemp. Environmental policy instruments. Varieties of policy instruments. Emission trading in operation.

tristram
Download Presentation

Policy instruments for environmental protection

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Policy instruments for environmental protection Presentation 9 Environment and Sustainable Development course UNU-MERIT PhD programme René Kemp

  2. Environmental policy instruments

  3. Varieties of policy instruments

  4. Emission trading in operation • US SO2 “Acid Rain” Trading Began in 1995Significant emissions reduction with > 30% savings vs non-flexible methodsUS NOx Trading ProgramsCalifornia “RECLAIM” SO2 & NOx, began 1994Northeastern states, began 1999Texas began 2002Expansion of NE states program (NOx SIP Call) to Midwest & SE, 2004 • UK ETSBegan in 2002 • Chicago Climate ExchangeVoluntary GHG trading system; began late 2003 • EU ETSBegan January, 2005

  5. Carbon trading in the EU

  6. Acclaimed advantages of economic instruments • Static efficiency • Informational economy • Government revenue possibilities • Incentives for environment-saving technical change • Self-reinforcing

  7. Common problems with economic instruments • Poor monitoring • Many companies not invoiced • Of the invoiced, many do not pay (especially state companies) • Fees set at a low level for political reasons • Fees been given back to polluters in the form of subsidies to pollution control • Often better to pay the fee that do something

  8. “. . . Environmental policy implementation is often difficult given the lack of appropriate control, monitoring and start-up mechanisms. In some cases the legal framework for environmental management is diluted in numerous legal texts and throughout diverse institutions, and environmental matters are often delegated to several public institutions at different political levels. The creation of new policies and institutions does not always include a revision of previous legislation” (UNEP, 2000, referring to Latin America)

  9. A 3-stage model for environmental policy • One possible path would begin with a technology requirement - - all sources in a certain industry would be required to install a particular technology. This is easy to monitor and can be done when technology costs are not prohibitively high. • As discharge monitoring capability and general civil service morale increased, the technology requirement could be translated into a technology-based discharge standard, as in the U.S. water pollution control system permits. • Finally, the permits could be made marketable when the information and record-keeping infrastructure was judged ready to support the move. For water pollution, effluent charges can be used. Source: Russel and Vaughan, forthcoming

  10. Clean development mechanism • Its stated objectives: • Give industrialised nations flexibility to meet emission reduction obligations (by investing in projects in the South and taking climate credits in their balance sheet) and • Promote sustainable development in developing countries. • Emanated from Brazil proposal (pressure from India for equitable climate treaty)

  11. CDM projects over the world

  12. Conclusions • There is no universally right choice of instrument • Instruments need laws, procedures, agencies (staffed and funded), technology for monitoring, and very important an ethos of responsibility and compliance • Incentive systems are often perverse

More Related