1 / 31

Understanding temporal trends in HIV prevalence, incidence and ARV

Understanding temporal trends in HIV prevalence, incidence and ARV. Dr Valerie Delpech Head of HIV surveillance Public Health England. How do we measure TasP at the population level?. Challenges of Test and Treat. Efficacy versus effectiveness Individual versus public health benefit

xarles
Download Presentation

Understanding temporal trends in HIV prevalence, incidence and ARV

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Understanding temporal trends in HIV prevalence, incidence and ARV Dr Valerie DelpechHead of HIV surveillancePublic Health England

  2. How do we measure TasP at the population level?

  3. Challenges of Test and Treat • Efficacy versus effectiveness • Individual versus public health benefit • Feasibility and acceptability • Ethics • Resistance and toxicity • Role of primary HIV infection in transmission • MSM versus heterosexual epidemics • Role of undiagnosed HIV in transmission • Linkage to care and access to ART 3

  4. What is successful Treatment as Prevention? • ?Elimination or ?decrease in incidence /new HIV infections • ?Elimination or ?reduction in AIDS deaths • ?Impact on STIs • How do we monitor our successes and failures? • Hard measures – ‘surveillance’ data in key populations • new diagnosis, AIDS and non AIDS deaths • late diagnosis, linkage and retention in care, testing and treatment uptake, viral suppression – ‘continuum of care • STI rates, behavioural data • Estimates • incidence, undiagnosed infections • Should NOT be used as ‘substitute’ for surveillance

  5. HIV Prevention Technologies Shown to Be Effective in Reducing HIV Incidence in Randomized Clinical Trials

  6. HIV incidence 2040 Granich RM et al, Lancet 2009; 373: 48–57 2020 2000

  7. British Columbia, Canada: Montaner et al (2010)

  8. Among approximately 77,600 persons living with diagnosed HIV infection in the UK • 97% are linked to care after diagnosis within 3 months • 95% are retained in care annually • 92% of persons in need are on treatment (85% of all persons in care) • 95% of persons on treatment achieve VL<200 copies/ml

  9. Annual new HIV and AIDS diagnoses and deaths: UK, 1981-2012 ART available First test for HIV Mortality and causes of death among women living with HIV in the UK in the era of HAART

  10. New HIV diagnoses in the UK by exposure category: 2003 - 2012

  11. Uptake and HIV tests among MSM attending STI clinics, UK

  12. CD 4 back-calculation method of annual HIV incidence in MSM: England & Wales 2001-2010 Birrell P.J. Gill O.N., Delpech V.C et al (2013). HIV incidence in men who have sex with men in England and Wales 2001–10: a nationwide population study. The LancetID-D-12-0107 - S1473-3099(12)70341-9

  13. Back-calculation estimate of HIV incidence and prevalence of undiagnosed infection among MSM: UK, 2003-2012 HIV in the United Kingdom: 2013

  14. MPES SOPHID Treatment cascade of adults living with HIV: United Kingdom, 2012 Treatment cascade of adults living with HIV: United Kingdom, 2011

  15. UK Continuum of care ‘cascade’ • DATA SOURCES • Estimates of undiagnosed infections using Multi Parameter Evidence Synthesis Model • Routine HIV surveillance data • UA programmes in key pops • Natsal – nationally representative sexual health survey • Behavioural data in key pops • ‘In care’ data consists of linked comprehensive national data • new diagnoses • CD4 and VL laboratory data • Persons in HIV clinics - annual updates Presentation title - edit in Header and Footer

  16. Prevalence of diagnosed HIV infection by region of residence among population aged 15-59 years: United Kingdom, 2011 Less than 1 1-2 London >2

  17. People living with HIV by diagnostic and treatment status, and number with detectable viral load, UK, 2006-2012

  18. HIV epidemic in the United Kingdom

  19. First Year of HIV care is cruciallate diagnoseslink to carehigh uptake of ARThigh 1 yr mortality in late Dx

  20. Late HIV diagnosis: Proportion* of adults diagnosed with a CD4 count <350 cells ,UK, 2012 HIV in the United Kingdom: 2013

  21. Prompt1and late² HIV diagnosis in MSM with associated short-term mortality³: United Kingdom, 2002 - 2011 ¹Prompt diagnosis: CD4 count ≥350 cells/mm³ within 91 days of diagnosis ²Late diagnosis: CD4 count <350 cells/mm³ within three months of diagnosis ³Percentage of patients known to have died within a year of diagnosis.

  22. Exploration of the CD4 Data Warehouse – South Africa Simbarashe Takuva, Adrian Punen Aliison Brown, Valerie Delpech Centre for HIV and STIs, National Institute for Communicable Diseases, NHLS, Johannesburg.

  23. PLHIV in South Africa: Spectrum estimatePersons in HIV Care using CD4 as marker

  24. CD4 Count Distribution, SA2004-2012 Source: CDW, 2013

  25. HIV clinical dashboardIndividual based clinical outcome data at the local level

  26. HIV clinical dashboard: England Poster number: WEPE175

  27. HIV Dashboard: Quality of care for newly-diagnosed by trust • 135 trusts in England • 5,808 newly-diagnosed adults in 2012 • 4,820 linked to HARS cohort record Poster number: WEPE175

  28. Quality of care dashboard for all adults in care by Trust Poster number: WEPE175

  29. Conclusions and Public health relevance • Successes (and failures) of public health policies including TasP can be measured using basic routine surveillance data for key risk groups and over time • Accurate and comprehensive (representative) data and clear consistent methodologies are key for tracking progress • HIV surveillance data should be linked to vital statistics death data • CD4 data are extensively used to track the epidemic – • late diagnosis, link to care, retention in care, back-calculation estimates, as well as evaluation of treatment guidelines, estimates of incidence and undiagnosed • VL – provide insight into success of treatment programs and ongoing transmission • Other markers are also important – STI and behavioural data • Clinical dashboards at the local level in key populations provide accountability and can drive improvements Presentation title - edit in Header and Footer

  30. NO ONE SHOULD DIE OF AIDS IN 2014 NO ONE ANYWHERE

  31. Thank-you We gratefully acknowledge all the persons living with HIV as well as clinicians, health advisors, nurses, microbiologists, public health practitioners, data managers and other colleagues who contribute to the surveillance of HIV and STIs in the UK.

More Related