1 / 11

Institute of Psychological Sciences

The Evaluation Network. Institute of Psychological Sciences. Evaluating Teaching. Module and Programme Review: Psychology’s Model. Mitch Waterman Director of Learning and Teaching. The Evaluation Network. Institute of Psychological Sciences. Key Features: Two forms of module review

zarek
Download Presentation

Institute of Psychological Sciences

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Evaluation Network Institute of Psychological Sciences Evaluating Teaching Module and Programme Review: Psychology’s Model Mitch Waterman Director of Learning and Teaching

  2. The Evaluation Network Institute of Psychological Sciences • Key Features: • Two forms of module review • Integrated Observation of Teaching • Sub-Committee of LTC • Separate Programme Review

  3. The Evaluation Network Institute of Psychological Sciences Two forms of Module Review: Minor Review: (Every yr, unless problems, then Major Review) Major Review: (2nd Yr of Module, then every 4 yrs, unless problems) Staff enter their own data and compile report using standard form (includes statistics, and comments)

  4. The Evaluation Network Institute of Psychological Sciences Major Review Form for Single-Authored Modules

  5. The Evaluation Network Institute of Psychological Sciences

  6. Institute of Psychological Sciences Minor Review Form for Single-Authored Modules

  7. The Evaluation Network Institute of Psychological Sciences Integrated Observation of Teaching • Staff/PGs observed each year by staff • All forms of teaching • Observer/Observed agree report • Report indicates ‘Practice for Dissemination’ • Practice Section sent to Module/Programme Review Sub-Committee • Report sent to Head of Institute (for career development)

  8. The Evaluation Network Institute of Psychological Sciences Module/Programme Review Sub-Committee • ‘Arms Length’ Sub-Committee of LTC • Meets after each semester • Considers each review in context of previous year’s review • For Major reviews Module leader is invited • Writes to Module Leaders • Alerts LTC of problems • Reports to FLTC

  9. The Evaluation Network Institute of Psychological Sciences Separate Programme Review • Questionnaire at end of Programme • About ‘whole programme experience’ • Administered when students submit projects • Collected when students collect their copies • Distinct from Module Reviews • Reports to LTC • Reports to Staff Briefing in September and FLTC

  10. The Evaluation Network Institute of Psychological Sciences Recent discussions and alterations • With large numbers, entering data a problem • Move to biennial reviews for modules above 3.5 • Major reviews move to every 6th year • New staff annual reviews for 3 years • Whole observation report to MPRSC • Questions on staff review about observation/teaching • Consider machine-readable/online

  11. The Evaluation Network Institute of Psychological Sciences And finally ….. Even more recent discussions and alterations (LTC last week) • Abandon Major reviews • Revise Module Review Form to include prompts from Major Review • Whole observation report to MPRSC and HoD • Questions on staff review about observation/teaching

More Related