1 / 21

Triplet corrector layout

Triplet corrector layout. Massimo Giovannozzi – CERN Acknowledgements: R . De Maria, S. Fartoukh. Outline. Introduction New layout of correctors Impact of non-linear correctors on dynamic aperture Strength specification of correctors Summary and outlook. Outline. Introduction

Download Presentation

Triplet corrector layout

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Triplet corrector layout Massimo Giovannozzi – CERN Acknowledgements: R. De Maria, S. Fartoukh

  2. Outline Introduction New layout of correctors Impact of non-linear correctors on dynamic aperture Strength specification of correctors Summary and outlook

  3. Outline Introduction New layout of correctors Impact of non-linear correctors on dynamic aperture Strength specification of correctors Summary and outlook

  4. Introduction - I • Situation in nominal LHC: • Non-linear corrector package provides compensation for non-linear errors in the IR (triplets, D1, D2). • Location of the correctors changed between V6.4 and V6.5 to provide more favourable optical conditions.

  5. Introduction - II • Overview of the strength situation for the nominal machine • Overview of the optical conditions

  6. Introduction - III • Strategy to set the correctors’ strength (see S. Fartoukh, LHC Project Note 349): minimisation of driving terms. • Selection of the driving terms to be corrected: • b3: c(b3; 1, 2) and c(b3; 2, 1) • a3: c(a3; 0, 3) and c(a3; 3, 0) • b4: c(b4; 4, 0) and c(b4; 0, 4) • a4: c(a4; 3, 1) and c(a4; 1, 3) • b6: c(b6; 0, 6) and c(b6; 6, 0) The choice of the resonances is based on the proximity to the working point Feed down effects are not included in the correction strategy.

  7. Introduction - IV • Other facts: • From numerical simulations it is found that non-linear correctors should not be used above 1 m of beta*. About 2 s difference depending on the use of the non-linear triplets’ correctors.

  8. Introduction - IV • Other facts: • So far the non-linear correctors have not been used in operationdue to difficulties with the temperature control (to be fixed during LS1). • This year these correctors have been used for the first time during MDs in an attempt to correct the non-linear field errors in the IR. • To be noted that these correctors provide additional sources of tune spread…

  9. Outline Introduction New layout of correctors Impact of non-linear correctors on dynamic aperture Strength specification of correctors Summary and outlook

  10. New layout of correctors - I • The proposed lattice for HL-LHC foresees a number of non-linear correctors: • In addition to those already installed in the LHC (i.e., b3, a3, b4, a4, b6) also b5, a5, and a6 are proposed. • To note that: • The D1 magnet is now superconducting. • Almost no drift left between corrector package and D1.

  11. New layout of correctors - II Feed down effects are not included in the correction strategy. • Strategy to set the correctors’ strength similar to that for the nominal machine. • Selection of the driving terms to be corrected: • a5: c(a5; 0, 5) and c(a5; 5, 0) • b5: c(b5; 5, 0) and c(b5; 0, 5) • a6: c(a6; 5, 1) and c(a6; 1, 5)

  12. Outline Introduction New layout of correctors Impact of non-linear correctors on dynamic aperture Strength specification of correctors Summary and outlook

  13. Impact of non-linear correctors on DA Clear positive impact on DA. No systematic check corrector by corrector.

  14. Outline Introduction New layout of correctors Impact of non-linear correctors on dynamic aperture Strength specification of correctors Summary and outlook

  15. Strength specification of correctors - I • Checked the distribution of strengths for the usual 60 realisations of the multipole errors in triplets and D1. • Data from IR1/5, left and right side of IRs have been combined. • Error tables used: • Triplets: June 2012 table provided by WP3 (E. Todesco). • D1: November 2012 table provided by WP3 (E. Todesco). A cross-check with a table based on improved DX magnet (S. Fartoukh) has been made too.

  16. Strength specification of correctors - II Error tables used: To note the difference between b6 and a6…

  17. Strength specification of correctors - III Main results: The impact of the difference between b6 and a6…

  18. Strength specification of correctors - IV Additionally, the required strength can be estimated (upper bound) by taking the integrated strength of the errors from triplets and D1. In summary (results are given in terms of unnormalisedKn L): Tentative proposal Upper bound for DX or D1 error tables Estimates using DX or D1 error tables

  19. Summary and outlook • Comments on the proposed non-linear correction system in the triplets: • Globally (very) effective to improve the dynamic aperture. • Proposed possible strength specification for each corrector. • Feed down effects to be reviewed? Maybe they should be included in the strategy to set the strength of the correctors.

  20. Thank you for your attention

More Related