1 / 31

Measuring the Number of Degrees of Freedom in 3-d CFT

Measuring the Number of Degrees of Freedom in 3-d CFT. Igor Klebanov Institute for Advanced Study and Princeton University Talk at Rutgers University September 27, 2011. The talk is based mainly on the papers

leland
Download Presentation

Measuring the Number of Degrees of Freedom in 3-d CFT

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Measuring the Number of Degrees of Freedom in 3-d CFT Igor Klebanov Institute for Advanced Study and Princeton University Talk at Rutgers University September 27, 2011

  2. The talk is based mainly on the papers • C. Herzog, I.K., S. Pufu, T. Tesileanu, Multi-Matrix Models and Tri-Sasaki Einstein Spaces, 1011.5487. • D. Jafferis, I.K., S. Pufu, B. Safdi, Towards the F-Theorem: N=2 Field Theories on the Three-Sphere, 1103.1181. • I.K., S. Pufu, B. Safdi, F-Theorem without Supersymmetry, 1105.4598.

  3. A deep problem in QFT is how to define a `good’ measure of the number of degrees of freedom which decreases along RG flows and is stationary at fixed points. • In two dimensions this problem was beautifully solved by Alexander Zamolodchikov who, using two-point functions of the stress-energy tensor, found the c-function which satisfies these properties.

  4. At RG fixed points the c-function coincides with the Virasoro central charge, which is also the Weyl anomaly. It also determines the thermal free energy. • For d>2 it also seems physically reasonable to use the coefficient cT of the thermal free energy as the measure of the number of degrees of freedom: • It can be extracted from the Euclidean path integral on

  5. No cT Theorem! • However, there are counterexamples to the hypothetical cT theorem in d>2. • In d=3 Sachdev calculated the thermal free energy of the O(N) vector model, • In the critical model m=0, and

  6. A relevant pertubation of this fixed point with makes it flow to the Goldstone phase described in the IR by N-1 free scalar fields. • Hence, in the IR • For large enough N this exceeds the UV value. This means that cT does not always decrease along RG flow. • Another idea for generalizing the c-theorem to higher dimensions was proposed by Cardy.

  7. The a-theorem • In d=4 there are two Weyl anomaly coefficients, and one of them, called a is proportional to the 4-d Euler characteristic. It can be extracted from the Euclidean part integral on the 4-d sphere. • Cardy has conjectured that the a-coefficient decreases along any RG flow. • No working counterexamples. A proof was recently proposed. Komargodski, Schwimmer

  8. In theories with N=1 SUSY, the a-coefficient is determined by the R-charges a = Trf 3 (3R3 – R)/32 • Intriligator and Wecht proposed that the R-symmetry is determined by locally maximizing a. This a-maximization principle has passed many consistency checks. • In large N theories dual to type IIB strings on the a-coefficient is inversely proportional to the volume of Y5. AdS and CFT definitions of a agree.

  9. How do we extend these successes to odd dimensions where there are no anomalies? • This is clearly interesting, especially in d=3 where there is an abundance of conformal field theories, some of them describing critical points in statistical mechanics and condensed matter physics. • It has been proposed that the `good’ measure of the number of DOF is the free energy on the 3-sphere Jafferis; Jafferis, IK, Pufu, Safdi

  10. In field theories with extended supersymmetry, the localization approach reduces the Euclidean path integral on a sphere to a finite dimensional integral, a matrix model. Pestun; Kapustin, Willett, Yaakov; Jafferis; … • In d=3 theories with N=2 SUSY the marginality of superpotential often leaves some freedom in R-symmetry. Jafferis proposed that this freedom is fixed by locally extremizing (in fact, maximizing) F. • This is the 3-d analogue of a-maximization.

  11. AdS/CFT Matching of F • In large N models which have duals it is possible to compare the CFT result with the corresponding gravity calculation. After subtracting cubic and linear divergences, it gives • The N3/2 scaling is a common feature of many leading order results in AdS4. IK, Tseytlin

  12. The field theory calculations of F via large N matrix models reproduce this gravity results in a variety of models. • The first success was achieved for the ABJM theory which is the U(N)k x U(N)-k Chern-Simons gauge theory dual to AdS4 x S7/Zk.

  13. To gain some intuition, the eigenvalue positions in the complex plane can be studied numerically using the saddle point equations

  14. In the large N limit where k is kept fixed, the correct ansatz is • Cancellation of long-range forces on eigenvalues enables us to write a local functional • We find and a constant eigenvalue density.

  15. The matrix model free energy agrees with the AdS formula after we use vol (S7/Zk) = p4/(3k) Drukker, Marino, Putrov; Herzog, IK, Pufu, Tesileanu • Reducing supersymmetry to N=3, there exists a nice set of CS gauge theories with `necklace’ quivers for which exact agreement has also been obtained

  16. N=2 SUSY • Now the R-charges are not fixed by supersymmetry. This offers nice oportunities to test the F-maximization, F-theorem and AdS/CFT. • As a function of the trial R-charges the matrix model free energy is Jafferis

  17. For example, for the ABJM model with more general R-charges • the free energy is • Maximizing this we obtain the standard R-charges ½ and • If we add a relevant operator then in the gauge with

  18. Performing the F-maximization in the IR theory we find • Consistent with the F-theorem and with AdS/CFT. The conjectured gravity dual of the IR theory is Warner’s SU(3) symmetric extremum of the gauged SUGRA. Benna, IK, Klose, Smedback

  19. No SUSY • The simplest CFT’s involve free conformal scalar and fermion fields. Adding mass terms makes such a theory flow to a theory with no massless degrees of freedom in the IR where F=0. • For consistency with F-theorem, the F-coefficients for free massless fields should be positive.

  20. Conformal Scalar on Sd • In any dimension • The eigenvalues and degeneracies are • Using zeta-function regularization in d=3,

  21. A massless Dirac fermion • The eigenvalues and degeneracies are • Using zeta-function regularization • For a chiral multiplet (complex scalar+fermion) F= (log 2)/2

  22. Slightly Relevant Operators • Perturb a CFT by a relevant operator of dimension • The path integral on a sphere is • The 1-pt function vanishes.

  23. The 2- and 3-pt function are determined by conformal invariance in terms of the chordal distance • The change in the free energy is

  24. The beta function for the dimensionless coupling is • Integrating the RG equation and setting the scale to inverse sphere radius

  25. For C>0 there exists a robust IR fixed point at • The 3-sphere free energy decreases • A similar calculation for d=1 provided initial evidence for the G-theorem conjectured by Affleck and Ludwig. • For a general odd dimension, what decreases along RG flow is

  26. Double-Trace Flows • If we perturb a large N CFT by a relevant double-trace operator, it flows to another fixed point in the IR • If in the UV the dimension of F is D, in the IR it is d- D • F can be calculated using the Hubbard-Stratonovich trick

  27. The change in F between IR and UV is of order 1 and is computable Gubser, IK; Diaz, Dorn • In all odd dimensions • For d=3

  28. The change in free energy is negative, in support of the F-theorem • The particular case D=1 corresponds to the critical O(N) model

  29. O(N) Model Redux • The critical O(N) model is obtained via a double-trace perturbation of the theory of N free real scalars • Using our free and double-trace results • A further relevant perturbation takes it to the Goldstone phase where

  30. Recall that the flow from the critical to the Goldstone phase provided a counter-example to the proposal that the thermal free energy decreases along RG flow. • Yet, there is no contradiction with the F-theorem since

  31. Comments • The `F-theorem’ has passed some consistency checks both via field theory and using gauge/gravity duality. More should be done to search for counterexamples, or perhaps even prove it. • Another recent proposal for measuring the degrees of freedom, this time in Lorentzian signature, is the entanglement entropy of a disk with its complement in R2. Myers, Sinha It appears to be equivalent to F. Casini, Huerta, Myers

More Related