1 / 57

Reconstruction of the Eads Bridge Highway Deck

Reconstruction of the Eads Bridge Highway Deck. Michael J. Cronin, PE, SE. Eads Bridge History. Opened to traffic July 4, 1874 Designed and planned by James Buchanan Eads Underwater salvage expert Shipbuilder No formal education

nola
Download Presentation

Reconstruction of the Eads Bridge Highway Deck

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Reconstruction of the Eads Bridge Highway Deck Michael J. Cronin, PE, SE

  2. Eads Bridge History • Opened to traffic July 4, 1874 • Designed and planned by James Buchanan Eads • Underwater salvage expert • Shipbuilder • No formal education • Hired by the St. Louis and Illinois Bridge Company as engineer-in-chief for this project

  3. Eads Bridge History • Design and construction innovations • deep pressurized caisson construction

  4. Eads Bridge History • Design and construction innovations • deep pressurized caisson construction • high strength cast steel

  5. Eads Bridge History • Design and construction innovations • deep pressurized caisson construction • high strength cast steel • design of components to permit ease of replacement

  6. Eads Bridge History • Design and construction innovations • deep pressurized caisson construction • high strength cast steel • design of components to permit ease of replacement • cantilever construction of main arch spans

  7. Eads Bridge History • Design and construction innovations • Deep pressurized caisson construction • high strength cast steel • design of components to permit ease of replacement • cantilever construction of main arch spans • 500 ft spans were 200 ft longer than any built previously

  8. Bridge Ownership History • Illinois and St Louis Bridge Company • Missouri Pacific Railroad Company • Terminal Railroad Association • City of St. Louis / Bi-State Development Agency

  9. Rehabilitation Challenges • Preserve historically important aesthetic elements • Use existing substructure to support new highway deck • Maintain light rail traffic during construction

  10. New Cross Section • Four 11 ft lanes designed for HS-20 loading • 1 ft offset between outside lanes and the Jersey barriers • 5 ft sidewalk on south side of roadway

  11. Bridge Sections • West Approach • West Arcade • Main Spans • East Arcade • East Approach

  12. West Approach & East Arcade • Substructure: 3 longitudinal walls • Outside walls of stone or brick masonry, original construction • Center wall of minimally reinforce concrete, constructed in the 1920’s • Substructure repairs • Tuckpointing • Crack repair • Reinforced concrete pads

  13. West Approach & East Arcade • Longitudinal concrete beams over First and Second Streets • Spalled and cracked • Some section loss in reinforcing • Capacity found to be marginally acceptable • Repairs • fiber composite wrap • total replacement

  14. West Approach & East Arcade • Existing superstructure: transverse concrete floorbeams with distinctive sloped ends • Replaced with prestressed concrete I girders with special ends • designed as 2 span continuous to maintain distribution to supporting walls • Precast SIP form panels utilized

  15. West Arcade • Substructure: 2 longitudinal walls • East portion - stone masonry arches in fairly good condition • concrete infill used to strengthen arches • West portion - reinforced concrete open arches in poor condition • total replacement with new reinforced concrete arches

  16. West Arcade • Existing superstructure • non-composite rolled beams at 4 ft spacing • deck replaced in early 1980’s • design called for cleaning & painting beams, scarifying & overlaying deck • Change order proposed by contractor • total replacement of superstructure with composite rolled beams at 8.5 ft spacing

  17. Main Spans • Existing substructure - 2 piers and 2 abutments founded on bedrock • Good condition • Top surfaces of piers and abutments required crack repair and resurfacing

  18. Main Spans • Arch truss superstructure • no retrofit required if dead load from new floor system and deck is held < 116 psf

  19. Main Span Floor System • Existing floor system: half-filled grid deck on floorbeams at 6 ft spacing • New floor system eliminated floorbeams between columns - 12 ft spacing • Exodermic™ Deck specified to span the 12 ft between floorbeams • 74 psf using standard weight aggregate

  20. Main Span Floor System • The Exodermic™ deck, or an “unfilled steel grid deck composite with a ±4.5” reinforced concrete slab” provides: • Light weight • Structural efficiency • Protection of Light Rail operating below

  21. ExodermicTM Bridge Deck

  22. Special Main Span Features • Overlook areas at piers and abutments • Bridge can be closed to traffic for special weekend events • Electrical outlets built into north barrier

  23. East Approach • 10 spans of new steel superstructure on new concrete substructure - 1000 ft • Highway deck starts above MetroLink track and end below • Highway deck had to be built around MetroLink bridge and elevated station as well as abandoned foundations

  24. East Approach • Drilled shaft construction • one shaft per pier • up to 7 ft in diameter • utilized to minimize footprint and to avoid vibrating adjacent MetroLink foundation

More Related